Our method

The report is the product

Anyone can walk a property and write down what they see. What decides whether a developer closes a defect is the document that lands afterwards: how completely it was gathered, how precisely it was recorded, and whether a contractor can act on it without ringing you to ask what you meant.

412 checkpoints · 488 on a villaNone skippableCalibrated instruments, certified annuallyReport delivered immediately on site

The software

We inspect on software built by someone who had read too many bad reports

We do not write reports in Microsoft Word. Every inspection is recorded in purpose-built inspection software, on site, as we work. We chose it rather than commissioned it, which we think is the more useful fact.

It was developed by a specialist we have known for years, for exactly the reason that brought us to Dubai: too many snagging reports are assembled by hand afterwards, from memory and a camera roll, and it shows. He built the tool he wanted to exist. When we set up here we tested what was available and used it, because nothing else enforced completeness the way it does.

The alternative, a surveyor typing up notes in the evening, is where reports quietly lose their value. Items get dropped. Photographs are matched to the wrong room. A finding is described rather than measured. None of that is dishonesty; it is what happens when the document is assembled separately from the inspection.

What that rules out

A checkpoint quietly passed over because the room was occupied

Photographs that cannot be tied back to a specific finding

“Poor finish to bedroom wall” in place of a measurement

Numbering that shifts between the original list and the re-inspection

A report that arrives four days later, after the developer has closed the file

Findings and photographs

Every finding sits beside its own photograph

This is the difference you will notice first. Most snagging reports put the photographs in an annex at the back, or in the footer of each page, leaving whoever has to fix the defect flicking between two halves of a document trying to work out which image belongs to which line. Contractors do not do that. They fix what they can identify and leave the rest.

In our reports the finding, its location, its measurement, its severity and its photograph occupy the same block on the page. A contractor can be handed one entry and act on it without reading anything else.

Typical report: photographs in an annex

Annex A, page 24

Photograph
Photograph
Photograph

Fig. 41–43. Which line do these belong to?

Ours: one block per finding

2.14 · BEDROOM 2

Floor level deviation 7mm over 2m straightedge, north–south. Tolerance ±4mm.

Major14:22
Photograph

2.15 · BEDROOM 2

Door leaf binds on frame at latch edge. Reveal 2mm at head, 6mm at floor.

Minor14:26
Photograph

Sketch, not a screenshot. The published sample report is the real thing →

Completeness

Nothing can be skipped, because the software will not let us

412 checkpoints in an apartment, 488 in a villa. Each one is a discrete record that must be resolved as passed, failed with a measurement, or marked not applicable with a reason. There is no way to close an inspection with a checkpoint left blank, and no way to submit a failure without the evidence attached to it.

Structured, not a blank page

The checklist is generated from the property itself: every room, every element in it, every check that applies to that element. A five-bathroom villa produces five sets of bathroom checks, not one to be repeated from memory.

Evidence is mandatory

A failed checkpoint cannot be saved without a photograph and a measurement where one applies. The evidence is captured at the point of the finding, not gathered afterwards.

Located and timed

Every entry carries its room, its position within that room, and the time it was recorded. A developer disputing whether we were on site, or for how long, is arguing with a timestamped record.

The standard

British tolerances, written into the checks themselves

The tolerances we measure against are not ours. The Dubai Building Code and UAE Civil Defence requirements govern what may be built and what keeps it safe, and we reference both — but neither sets a finish tolerance. So for finishes we apply the figures British homes are built and warranted to: NHBC Standards and BS 5606 on accuracy of construction. Those figures are built into the checklist as numbers, so a finding is either inside tolerance or outside it.

This is the whole reason the practice exists. Dubai construction is fast and largely good, but handover inspection here is often opinion delivered as a list. British surveying practice starts from a published figure and measures against it. That is a harder thing to argue with, and a far more useful thing to hand a developer.

Measured, not described

“7mm over a 2m straightedge against a ±4mm tolerance”, not “uneven floor”. The first is actionable. The second is a conversation.

UK experience behind it

The judgement of what matters, and what a developer will reasonably close, comes from inspecting British new-build stock, not from a checklist alone.

Severity is consistent

Major, minor and observation are applied against defined criteria, so the same defect is graded the same way in every report we issue.

What we inspect, room by room →

The figures

What we measure against

These are the principal tolerances in the checklist. They are drawn from NHBC Standards and BS 5606 — the standards our founders learned on British new-build, and the only published figures that cover residential finishes. Where a developer’s own specification is tighter, we work to the tighter figure. Life-safety items are checked against UAE Civil Defence requirements instead.

What we check
Tolerance
Measured with
Floor level and flatness
±4mm under a 2m straightedge
Laser level, 2m straightedge
Wall plumb, per storey
±5mm over 2.5m
Plumb rule, laser
Wall and ceiling flatness
±3mm under a 2m straightedge
2m straightedge, feeler gauge
Tile lippage
1mm floor, 0.5mm wall
Depth gauge
Door reveals and margins
3mm, consistent within 1mm
Feeler gauge
Falls to wet-area drainage
1:80 minimum, no ponding
Level, water test
Moisture in finished surfaces
Below 16% WME
Moisture meter, thermal camera
Air-conditioning supply temperature
Within 2°C of design across every outlet
Thermal camera, probe

How severity is graded

Critical

Affects safety, water-tightness or the ability to occupy. Raised with the developer the same day, not left to the report.

Major

Outside tolerance, or a failure of function. Requires rectification before the unit is accepted.

Minor

Cosmetic or within tolerance but below the standard of the surrounding work. Listed for correction, not a reason to refuse handover.

What a snagging inspection does not cover

A non-invasive inspection has limits, and saying so plainly is part of the standard. We do not:

open up structure, lift finished floors, or remove fixed panels

test concealed services, pressure-test pipework, or certify electrical installations

access roofs, façades or plant rooms that require equipment or permits

test or certify pool plant, lifts, or building-wide common systems — we record their visible condition only

value the property, or advise on whether to buy it

Where something needs a specialist beyond our scope, we say so in the report and tell you what to instruct.

Turnaround

The report is with you before we leave

Because the report is written on site rather than assembled afterwards, it is substantially complete when we leave. There is no evening of typing between the inspection and the document. What remains is review, and issue.

That matters more than it sounds. The days immediately after handover are when a developer’s snagging team is still mobilised and still willing. A list that arrives four days later, once the file has been closed and the contractors have moved to the next tower, is a harder thing to get actioned.

01

On site

4–6 hours for an apartment, a full day for a villa. Every finding recorded, measured and photographed as we go.

02

Before we leave

A verbal summary of what we found and what we would press hardest on. You know the position before you have read anything.

03

Before we leave

The full report issued: findings, measurements, photographs, severity, and a schedule the developer can work from.

04

Then we stay

Re-inspections are recorded against the original entries, so the list closes item by item rather than starting again.

One record, not three

The same record follows the property for a year

Your inspection is not a document we hand over and forget. It is a live record, and everything that happens afterwards is written back into it.

01Re-inspections keep the original numbering. Item 2.14 stays item 2.14 when we return. You can see at a glance what was closed, what was closed badly, and what was never touched, and so can the developer.
02Nothing is retyped between visits. Every re-inspection is an update to an existing entry, not a fresh list. Lists that start again are how items disappear.
03The 11-month check starts from what we already know. We arrive knowing which defects were closed under protest, which were patched rather than fixed, and which areas were weakest at handover, and we look there first.
The 11-month inspection →

Item 2.14, over three visits

HandoverRaised · 7mm deviation, majorOpen
Re-inspectRe-screeded · remeasured at 3mmClosed
Month 11Checked again · stable, no movementVerified

Sketch of the record structure. One item, three visits, one numbering.

See for yourself

We publish a full report, unredacted

Every claim on this page is checkable against a real document. The sample report is a genuine inspection with the address removed and nothing else changed. Read it before you decide anything.

Before the keys change hands

Tell us the property and the date. A fixed fee comes back the same working day.

Get a quoteWhatsApp